More generally, this sort of charge does not engage the long portion of the Sixth Meditation that concerns mind—body union and interaction and the embodied mind. As has been mentioned, Descartes explained many human behaviors through the machine of the body, without mental intervention.
Descartes envisioned similar purely mechanistic explanations for many of the behaviors that arise from the passions or emotions. In this connection, the body acts first and the felt experience of the passion has the function of getting the mind to want to do what the body is already doing Pass. In any event, Descartes by no means held that all human behavior does or should arise from rational deliberation.
Which is not to say that he devalued rational deliberation when there is time and need to undertake it. But he was under no illusion that all effective human behavior stems from reason.
How could interpreters get Descartes so wrong? They then use Descartes as a stalking horse. Moriarty suggests that many readers of Lacan and Foucault have not received the same education in philosophy or in Descartes.
The implication is that Lacan and Foucault engaged Descartes from a knowledge of his writings, whereas others who lack such knowledge misunderstand the value of such genuine engagement and take away misunderstood implications.
This would also explain how Descartes could be charged with denying the emotions even though he published an entire book on the Passions , and how the implications of this book might be overlooked by someone eager to find a famous target to disagree with.
Leaving aside such blatant misinterpretations, what is Descartes' legacy now? The breadth of his influence in the seventeenth century is permanent, including his specific contributions in mathematics and optics, his vision for a mechanistic physiology, and the model he offered to Newton of a unified celestial and terrestrial physics that assigns a few basic properties to a ubiquitous matter the motions of which are governed by a few simple laws.
In this regard, Descartes' work offers an example of culturally engaged philosophy. Descartes had a sense for the fundamental philosophical issues of his time, many of which concerned the theory of nature and the attempt to found a new natural science.
He not only offered a systematic reformulation of the extant natural philosophy, but he did so in a way that could be heard and understood. Beyond past historical influences, Descartes' philosophy continues to speak to us now and to offer new insights to new generations of philosophers who are in position to hear what he said.
This can be seen in the revival of body-first theories of the emotions. Ironically, some of Descartes' most vocal detractors among scientists who study the emotions, including Damasio , espouse theories similar in many respects to Descartes' own, on which, see Hatfield Further, his theories of sensory qualities have inspired new reflections Simmons , as has his account of distance perception see Wolf-Devine and the entries on optics and perception in Nolan More generally, his Meditations is one of the most finely crafted examples of philosophical prose in the entire history of philosophy.
That in itself ensures its ongoing relevance. In the end, Descartes' legacy partly consists of problems he raised, or brought into prominence, but did not solve. The mind—body problem is a case in point. Descartes himself argued from his ability clearly and distinctly to conceive mind and body as distinct beings to the conclusion that they really are separate substances.
Most philosophers today accept neither the methodological basis for his claim nor the claim itself. Indeed, since the time of Kant, few philosophers have believed that the clear and distinct thoughts of the human mind are a guide to the absolute reality of things.
Hence, the notion that even clear conceivability discerns metaphysical possibility is not accepted. Moreover, few philosophers today are substance dualists. All the same, the mind—body problem persists. In distinguishing the domain of the mental from that of the physical, Descartes struck a chord. Many philosophers accept the conceptual distinction, but remain uncertain of the underlying metaphysics: whether mind is identical with brain; or the mental emerges from complex processes in the brain; or constitutes a property that is different from any purely physical property, even while being instantiated by the brain.
In this case, a problem that Descartes made prominent has lived far beyond his proposed solution. Note on references and abbreviations: References to Descartes' works as found herein use the pagination of the Adam and Tannery volumes AT , Oeuvres de Descartes , 11 vols.
The AT volume numbers provide a guide to which work is being cited in translation: vols. Where there is no accessible translation for a citation from AT, the citation is shown in italics. Links to digitized photographic reproductions of early editions of Descartes' works may be found under Original editions and early translations of major works.
The following links are to other online editions:. Intellectual Biography 1. Philosophical Development 3. A New Metaphysics 3. The New Science 5. Theory of Sense Perception 6. He also presented an image of the relations among the various parts of philosophy, in the form of a tree: Thus the whole of philosophy is like a tree.
The roots are metaphysics, the trunk is physics, and the branches emerging from the trunk are all the other sciences, which may be reduced to three principal ones, namely medicine, mechanics and morals. Philosophical Development In general, it is rare for a philosopher's positions and arguments to remain the same across an entire life. A New Metaphysics Descartes first presented his metaphysics in the Meditations and then reformulated it in textbook-format in the Principles.
In the fifth set of Objections to the Meditations , Gassendi suggests that there is difficulty concerning what possible skill or method will permit us to discover that our understanding is so clear and distinct as to be true and to make it impossible that we should be mistaken.
As I objected at the beginning, we are often deceived even though we think we know something as clearly and distinctly as anything can possibly be known. In the words of Arnauld: I have one further worry, namely how the author avoids reasoning in a circle when he says that we are sure that what we clearly and distinctly perceive is true only because God exists.
But we can be sure that God exists only because we clearly and distinctly perceive this. Hence, before we can be sure that God exists, we ought to be able to be sure that whatever we perceive clearly and evidently is true. I saw that while I could pretend that I had no body and that there was no world and no place for me to be in, I could not for all that pretend that I did not exist. I saw on the contrary that from the mere fact that I thought of doubting the truth of other things, it followed quite evidently and certainly that I existed; whereas if I had merely ceased thinking, even if everything else I had ever imagined had been true, I should have had no reason to believe that I existed.
From this I knew I was a substance whose whole essence or nature is simply to think, and which does not require any place, or depend on any material thing, in order to exist. He held that human physiology is similar to nonhuman animal physiology, as regards both vegetative and some sensitive functions—those sensitive functions that do not involve consciousness or intelligence: Now a very large number of the motions occurring inside us do not depend in any way on the mind.
These include heartbeat, digestion, nutrition, respiration when we are asleep, and also such waking actions as walking, singing, and the like, when these occur without the mind attending to them. When people take a fall, and stick out their hands so as to protect their head, it is not reason that instructs them to do this; it is simply that the sight of the impending fall reaches the brain and sends the animal spirits into the nerves in the manner necessary to produce this movement even without any mental volition, just as it would be produced in a machine.
That is, we judge their size by the knowledge or opinion that we have of their distance, compared with the size of the images they imprint on the back of the eye—and not simply by the size of these images.
This is sufficiently obvious from the fact that the images imprinted by objects very close to us are a hundred times bigger than those imprinted by objects ten times farther away, and yet they do not make us see the objects a hundred times larger; instead they make the objects look almost the same size, at least if their distance does not deceive us. Legacy The things that readers find valuable in Descartes' work have changed over the centuries.
Bibliography Note on references and abbreviations: References to Descartes' works as found herein use the pagination of the Adam and Tannery volumes AT , Oeuvres de Descartes , 11 vols. Primary Literature: Works by Descartes Original editions and early translations of major works Leiden: Jan Maire. Digitized photographic reproduction DPR online pdf. Meditationes de prima philosophia, in qua Dei existentia et animae immortalitas demonstrantur.
Paris: Michel Soly. DPR online pdf. Amsterdam: Elzevir. Principia philosophiae. DPR online pdf and tiff. Etienne de Courcelles. Louis-Charles d'Albert, duc de Luynes Meds. The Seventh Objections and Replies appeared first in the 2nd French edn. Les principes de la philosophie , trans. Claude Picot. Paris: Henry Le Gras. A discourse of a method for the well guiding of reason, and the discovery of truth in the sciences. London: Thomas Newcombe.
Les passions de l'ame. Passiones animae , trans. Henry Desmarets. The passions of the soule. London: John Martin and John Ridley. Available through EEBO. Claude Clerselier. Paris: Charles Angot. DPRs online, Vol. De homine , trans. Florentius Schuyl. Leiden: Leffen and Moyardum. Le monde, ou, Le traite de la lumiere, et des autres principaux objects des sens. Paris: Girad. This is the first edition of Descartes' original French.
Six metaphysical meditations wherein it is proved that there is a God and that mans mind is really distinct from his body: hereunto are added the objections made against these meditations by Thomas Hobbes, with the authors answers , trans.
William Molyneux. London: Benjamin Tooke. This translation of the six Meditations proper is reprinted in Gaukroger Opuscula posthuma, physica et mathematica. Amsterdam: Blaeu. The first publication of the Rules in Latin a Dutch translation had appeared in , together with other writings.
Recent English translations Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology , trans. Paul J. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. Treatise of Man , trans. Thomas S. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
With an introduction and many explanatory notes. Principles of Philosophy , trans. Miller and R. Dordrecht: Reidel. A complete translation of the Principles. Philosophical Writings of Descartes , 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Passions of the Soul , trans. Stephen H. Indianapolis: Hackett. George Heffernan. A literal translation of the six Meditations proper, with facing-page Latin. Meditations and Other Metaphysical Writings , trans.
Desmond M. London: Penguin. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi. World and Other Writings , trans. Stephen Gaukroger. Discourse on Method and Related Writings , trans. Michael Moriarty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. A fresh translation with detailed explanatory notes. Secondary Literature References Carriero, John, Janet Broughton and John Carriero. Malden, Mass. Cottingham, John, John Cottingham. Oxford: Oxford University Press, — Damasio, Antonio, New York: Putnam.
Oeuvres de Descartes , 11 vols. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery, new edn. Cited by volume and page number. Doney, Willis ed. Eternal Truth and the Cartesian Circle. New York: Garland Publishing. Frankfurt, Harry G. Garber, Daniel, Descartes' Metaphysical Physics.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hatfield, Gary, Stephen Voss. New York: Oxford University Press, — London: Routledge, — Oxford: Blackwell, — John Carriero and Janet Broughton.
Karen Detlefsen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, — Jacquette, Dale, Loeb, Louis, Machamer, Peter, and J. McGuire, Moriarty, Michael, Nolan, Larry ed. The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon. Popkin, Richard H. History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley: University of California Press. Descartes: His Life and Thought , trans. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Essays on Descartes' Meditations. Rozemond, Marleen, Oxford: Blackwell, 48— Russell, Bertrand, Chicago: Open Court.
Schuster, John, New Jersey: Barnes and Noble, 41— Sebba, Gregor, Dream of Descartes. Carbondale, Ill. Simmons, Alison, Watson, Richard, Cogito, Ergo Sum , rev.
Boston: Godine. Wee, Cecilia, Material Falsity and Error in Descartes' Meditations. London: Routledge. Wells, Norman J. Wheeler, Michael, Cambridge: MIT Press. Wolf-Devine, Celia, Descartes on Seeing: Epistemology and Visual Perception.
Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. Other Readings Alanen, Lilli, Having identified this single indubitable principle , that thought exists , he then argued that, if someone was wondering whether or not he existed, then the very act of thinking was, in and of itself, proof that he did in fact exist: the famous "Je pense, donc je suis" "I think, therefore I am" - the similar statement in Latin, "Cogito ergo sum" is found in his later "Principles of Philosophy".
It is worth mentioning here that, by "thinking", Descartes did not just mean conceptual thought , but all forms of consciousness , experience, feelings, etc.
Having dispelled all doubt by this process, Descartes then worked to build up, or reconstitute , the world again. But he was careful not to do this willy-nilly, but only according to his own very strict rules , so that the "reconstituted world" was not the same as the original one which he had dismantled piece by piece due to doubts.
The way he achieved this which, it must be said, appears from a modern viewpoint like something of a conjuring trick was to argue that among the contents of our certain consciousness was the idea of God , which in itself he saw as proof of the existence of God. He then argued that, if we have the overwhelming impression of the existence of a concrete world around us, as we do, then an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent God would ensure that such a world does in fact exist for us.
Furthermore, he asserted that the essence of this physical world was extension that it takes up space , contrary to the extensionless world of the mind. Paradoxically, this was an essential step forward in 17th Century science as it established a physical world which was of a mathematical character and permitted mathematical physics to be used to explain it.
Also important is that, as we have seen, although God was indispensable to Descartes' method of arriving at a physical world, once such a world was accepted , it was no longer necessary to involve God in the description and measurement and explanation of how things work. Thus, the process of science was freed from theological constraints and interference. Descartes dismissed the senses and perception as unreliable , and to demonstrate this he used the so-called Wax Argument.
This revolves around the idea that a wax object, which has certain properties of size, color, smell, temperature, etc, appears to change almost all of these properties when it is melted, to the extent that it appears to our senses to be a completely different thing.
However, we know that it is in fact still the same piece of wax. Descartes concluded from this that the senses can be misleading and that reason and deduction is the only reliable method of attaining knowledge, which is the essence of Rationalism.
Descartes further argued that sensory perceptions come to him involuntarily not willed by him , and are therefore external to his senses and therefore evidence of the existence of an external world outside of his mind. He argued that the things in the external world are material because God would not deceive him as to the ideas that are being transmitted, and has given him the propensity to believe that such ideas are caused by material things.
Because of this belief that God is benevolent and does not desire to deceive him, he can therefore have some faith in the account of reality his senses provide him. Descartes believed that the human body works like a machine , that it has the material properties of extension and motion , and that it follows the laws of physics. He feared being expelled from the country and of seeing his books burned. In , at the age of forty-seven, Descartes moved to Egmond du Hoef.
With the Voetius controversy seemingly behind him though, as mentioned above, it would again raise its head and climax five years down the road , Descartes and Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia began to correspond. In this exchange, Princess Elisabeth probed Descartes on the implications of his commitment to mind-body dualism.
During this time, he completed a final draft of a new textbook, which he had begun three years earlier, the Principia Philosophiae Principles of Philosophy , and in it was published. He dedicated it to Princess Elisabeth. The Principles is an important text.
The work is divided into four Parts, with five hundred and four articles. Although it would appear to be a quick run through of the Meditations , there are a number of dissimilarities.
The principles introduced in Part Two are based on the metaphysics of Part One. And, the subsequent physics developed in Parts Three and Four is based upon the principles of Part Two. Although the physics turns out to be unsound, the Principles nevertheless inspired such great thinkers as Robert Boyle — , Edmond Halley — , and Isaac Newton.
As an important side note, it must be stressed that even though Descartes had throughout his career put a great deal of emphasis on mathematics, the physics developed in the Principles does not appear to be a mathematical physics. Rather, it is traditionally taken to be a conceptual project with only a hint of empirical overtones—a physics rooted entirely in metaphysics.
Two parts, never completed, were originally intended to deal with plants, animals, and man. In light of this and what Descartes says in a 31 January letter to the mathematician Constantijn Huygens, it is plausible to think that the Principles would have looked something like The World had it been completed as planned.
One of the more controversial positions the Principles forwarded, at least according to Newton, was that a vacuum was impossible. In other words, vacuum, taken as an extended nothing , is a flat contradiction.
The corporeal universe is thus a plenum, individual bodies separated only by their surfaces. Newton argued in his De Gravitatione and Principia that the concept of motion becomes problematic if the universe is taken to be a plenum. In line with the ancient atomist Epicurus, they argued that if matter was infinitely divisible, so dividing it would show that there was no bottom—and so, corporeality would not be substantial. So, if corporeality is substantial, as Descartes himself had claimed, there must be a minimum measure of extension that could not be divided by natural means, anyway.
And so, there are atoms. But, this conclusion is something that Descartes explicitly rejects in the Principles. During this year another prominent political figure began to correspond with Descartes, Queen Christina of Sweden.
And, Regius published what he took to be a new and improved version of Cartesian science, which as we now know would draw the wrath of Voetius. In response to this, Descartes wrote a single-page printed defense that was posted on public kiosks for all to read. However, as mentioned earlier, tensions mounted as a result of the public exchange and Descartes felt his way of life in the Netherlands to be threatened.
And, after a not too lengthy correspondence, Queen Christina offered Descartes a position in her court. For many reasons, which would certanily include those related to his concerns about Voetius, Descartes accepted the offer. And, in he left for Sweden. Queen Christina at first required very little from Descartes.
However, according to Gaukroger, this would change. For, after he had some time to settle in, she ordered him to do two things: first, to put all of his papers in order, and secondly, to put together designs for an academy Gaukroger, p.
Arguably, Descartes had some idea of how the latter might be done by way of his experience in Breda. In January of Queen Christina began to require Descartes to give her lessons in philosophy.
These apparently would begin at five in the morning and would last for about five hours. They were given three days a week Gaukroger, p. During this time Descartes published the Passions , the work having emerged primarily from his correspondence with Princess Elisabeth to whom he had dedicated the Principles.
Such passions can move us to action. Contact, in this context, seems to be possible only by way of surfaces. Now, bodies, since they are extended and thus have surfaces, can come into contact with one another and thus can cause one another to move. However, if minds are not extended, they lack surfaces. And, if they lack surfaces, there is no way in principle for bodies to come into contact with them.
Thus, there is no way in principle for bodies to move minds, and vice versa. While in Holland, he wrote to Beeckman in March about his new ideas:- [ I want to promote a ] completely new science by which all questions in general may be solved that can be proposed about any kind of quantity, continuous as well as discrete. But each according to its own nature.
In arithmetic, for instance, some questions can be solved by rational numbers, some by surd numbers, and others can be imagined but not solved. For continuous quantity I hope to prove that, similarly, certain problems can be solved by using only straight or circular lines, that some problems require other curves for their solution, but still curves which arise from one single motion and which therefore can be traced by the new compasses, which I consider to be no less certain and geometrical than the usual compasses by which circles are traced; and, finally, that other problems can be solved by curved lines generated by separate motions not subordinate to one another.
After this time in Holland he left the service of Maurice of Nassau and travelled through Europe with the plan to join the army of Maximilian of Bavaria. In he joined the Bavarian army and was stationed in Ulm. An important event in his life was three dreams he had in November These he believed were sent by a divine spirit with the intention of revealing to him a new approach to philosophy.
The ideas from these dreams would dominate much of his work from that time on. After this he left the army but since the plague was ravaging in Paris he could not return there but instead began a period of travel. From to Descartes travelled through Europe, spending time in Bohemia , Hungary , Germany, Holland and France - He spent time in in Paris where he made contact with Marin Mersenne , an important contact which kept him in touch with the scientific world for many years, and with Claude Mydorge.
From Paris he travelled through Switzerland to Italy where he spent some time in Venice and in Rome, then he returned to France again He renewed his acquaintance with Mersenne and Mydorge , and met Girard Desargues. His Paris home became a meeting place for philosophers and mathematicians and steadily became more and more busy. By Descartes, tired of the bustle of Paris, the house full of people, and of the life of travelling he had before, decided to settle down where he could work in solitude.
He gave much thought to choosing a country suited to his nature and he chose Holland. What he longed for was somewhere peaceful where he could work away from the distractions of a city such as Paris yet still have access to the facilities of a city. It was a good decision which he did not seem to regret over the next twenty years. He told Mersenne where he was living so that he might keep in touch with the mathematical world, but otherwise he kept his place of residence a secret.
He wrote to Mersenne in October :- [ The foundations of physics ] is the topic which I have studied more than any other and in which, thank God, I have not altogether wasted my time.
At least I think that I have found how to prove metaphysical truths in a manner which is more evident than the proofs of geometry - in my opinion, that is: I do not know if I shall be able to convince others of it. During my first nine months in this country I worked on nothing else.
This work was near completion when news that Galileo was condemned to house arrest reached him. He, perhaps wisely, decided not to risk publication and the work was published, only in part, after his death.
He explained later his change of direction saying In Holland, Descartes had a number of scientific friends as well as continued contact with Mersenne. His friendship with Beeckman continued and he also had contact with Mydorge , Hortensius, Huygens and Frans van Schooten the elder.
Langer [ ] describes Descartes' life in Holland:- As throughout his life he continued to do his work abed in the mornings. His evenings he generally devoted to the consideration of his correspondence, which was mainly scientific, rarely personal, and of which he was painstakingly careful, while the intermediate part of the day he gave to relaxation.
In matters of money he was neither extravagant nor parsimonious, showing himself in this respect a true philosopher. He always did some entertaining, now more, now less, professing to find considerable enjoyment in conversation, though he was himself rather taciturn.
The work describes what Descartes considers is a more satisfactory means of acquiring knowledge than that presented by Aristotle's logic. Only mathematics, Descartes feels, is certain, so all must be based on mathematics.
However his approach through experiment was an important contribution. However many of Descartes' claims are not only wrong but could have easily been seen to be wrong if he had done some easy experiments. For example Roger Bacon had demonstrated the error in the commonly held belief that water which has been boiled freezes more quickly.
However Descartes claims In [ 22 ] Scott summarises the importance of this work in four points:- He makes the first step towards a theory of invariants, which at later stages derelativises the system of reference and removes arbitrariness. Algebra makes it possible to recognise the typical problems in geometry and to bring together problems which in geometrical dress would not appear to be related at all.
Algebra imports into geometry the most natural principles of division and the most natural hierarchy of method. Not only can questions of solvability and geometrical possibility be decided elegantly, quickly and fully from the parallel algebra, without it they cannot be decided at all. Wallis writes There seems little to justify Wallis 's claim, which was probably made partly through patriotism but also through his just desires to give Harriot more credit for his work.
Harriot 's work on equations, however, may indeed have influenced Descartes who always claimed, clearly falsely, that nothing in his work was influenced by the work of others. Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy , was published in , designed for the philosopher and for the theologian. However many scientists were opposed to Descartes' ideas including Arnauld , Hobbes and Gassendi.
This is an important point of view and was to point the way forward. Descartes did not believe in action at a distance.
0コメント