But the source has its own software repositories and does not use Debian repositories. Many of the software inside it is syncing with Debian Repository software. The great thing about Ubuntu is that it has the most complete repository of all the Linux distributions. The Ubuntu project focuses on producing robust desktop and server versions so that the user can have an acceptable user experience of the operating system. As a result, it has no fear of producing new, fully customized technologies to enhance a better sense of user experience.
Ubuntu is the only company to use its graphical server called Mir, while other Linux distributions use Wayland. Ubuntu has always been an up-to-date operating system. He has promised to release a new version every six months. Once every 2 years, it offers a version with Long Term Support. Mint is an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution that uses the same Ubuntu repositories. Therefore, similar software packages are available for both.
Mint is generally a side-by-side distribution, with a strong focus on media codecs that Ubuntu did not include in its distributions by default. This distribution now has its own identity. You can not find the unity interface on Ubuntu.
This has led some Ubuntu developers to call this distribution unsafe. Debian is an operating system made up of free open-source software. The Debian project has been producing software since and is still releasing new versions. But Debian is generally known for its slow, steady movement.
Updates are slower than operating systems such as Ubuntu and Mint. This has stabilized Debian, which is great for some systems.
Ubuntu was originally created based on Debian to create a more stable platform and faster updates and optimizations. Software packaging takes place side by side in a user-friendly environment, which provides faster updates. Fedora is a project focused on free software. You can not find a simple solution to install graphic drivers on it. Although informal repositories are available and enable this, they are still not as simple as other distributions.
Fedora is a bleeding edge operating system and includes the latest version of software. The latest updates posted on Fedora are actually tested in the real world. If the test is successful, it will be placed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Unlike Ubuntu, Fedora has not developed its own user interface. Instead, the Fedora project uses upstream software. This interface provides a platform that puts all the upstream items together.
Without adding any special tools to it. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Necessary Necessary. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
These are forks Taking a copy and making changes of original Distros. The core packages need not be the same as the original distro. They support downloading and installing most of the packages that original distro supports but not all of them. They support downloading and installing all the packages that work on the original distro. They are usually maintained by a different set of people as the main goal of the derivative differs from the main goal of the original distro.
They are usually maintained by the same people that maintain the original distro as the main goal of the flavor is usually the same as the main goal of the original distro. But you will notice some differences between Linux versions, specifically:. Most distributions seem to differ simply based on which desktop environment they use. For example, Ubuntu offers several desktop environments depending on which flavor you choose. You can have:. Other distros have a more modest selection of desktops available, however, often offered as "spins" that contain different desktop environments.
An example distribution that does this is Fedora. Check our guide to the best Linux desktop environments to learn more about these differences. The people behind each Linux distribution can choose what software they include, such as file managers and package managers.
Distribution leaders have these options because each category of Linux software can have multiple applications. For example, several file managers are available for Linux, such Nautilus and Konqueror, each offering a different way to browse files. Another example is Linux package managers. Various methods for installing software are included with each Linux distribution, but they have an underlying package manager. On Debian-based distros such as Ubuntu and Linux Mint, dpkg is the choice, accessed via the apt dependency resolver.
Under the hood on Linux you'll find a selection of tools, applications, processes, and servers that determine how it runs. A key example of this is the display server. Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a commercial Linux distribution intended for servers and workstations. Red Hat uses trademark law to prevent their official Red Hat Enterprise Linux software from being redistributed.
However, the core software is free and open-source. SUSE was once one of the great user-friendly desktop Linux distributions, but Ubuntu eventually took that crown.
Mageia is a fork of Mandriva Linux created in Mandriva — known as Mandrake before that — was once one of the great user-friendly Linux distributions. Mandriva SA no longer creates a consumer Linux distribution for desktop PCs, but their business Linux server projects are based on Mageia code — just like how Fedora and openSUSE provide code to their enterprise equivalents.
Arch Linux is more old school than many of the other Linux distributions here. Instead, it means Arch dispenses with that stuff and gets out of your way. Instead, it provides clean configuration files designed for easy editing. This distribution has a bit in common with Gentoo, which was popular at one time.
Both Linux distributions are designed for users who know how their systems work or who are at least willing to learn. Slackware is another institution. Its pedigree shows — like Arch, Slackware dispenses with all those unnecessary graphical tools and automatic configuration scripts. Slackware boots to a command-line environment by default.
Puppy Linux is another fairly well-known Linux distribution. Previous versions have been built on Ubuntu, but the latest is built on Slackware. Puppy is designed to be a small, lightweight operating system that can run well on very old computers. Distrowatch lists many and tries to rank them by popularity. Image Credit: Eduardo Quagliato on Flickr. Browse All iPhone Articles Browse All Mac Articles Do I need one? Browse All Android Articles
0コメント